What are the long-term benefits of weight reducing diets in adults? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Author: Avenell A, Brown TJ, McGee MA, Campbell MK, Grant AM, Broom J, Jung RT, Smith WC

Author affiliation: Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK. a.avenell@abdn.ac.uk

Publication date & source: 2004.08, J Hum Nutr Diet., 17(4):317-35.

Publication type: Meta-Analysis; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Review

BACKGROUND: Evidence is needed for the best long-term diet for weight loss, and improvement in cardiac risk and disease in obese adults. METHODS: We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in any language. We searched 13 databases and handsearched journals. Trials lasted 1 year or more. One investigator extracted the data and a second checked data extraction. Trial quality was assessed. RESULTS: Low fat diets (LFDs) produced significant weight losses up to 36 months (-3.55 kg; 95% CI, -4.54 to -2.55 kg). Blood pressure, lipids and fasting plasma glucose improved with these diets after 12 months. Four studies found that LFDs may prevent type 2 diabetes and reduce antihypertensive medication for up to 3 years. A very low calorie diet (VLCD, < 4.2 MJ day(-1)) was associated with the most weight loss after 12 months (-13.40 kg; 95% CI, -18.43 to -8.37 kg) in one small study with beneficial effects on asthma. There was no evidence that low carbohydrate protein sparing modified fasts (PSMFs) were associated with greater long-term weight loss than low calorie diets (LCDs, 4.2-6.7 MJ day(-1)) or VLCDs. PSMFs were, however, associated with greater lowering of fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c than LCDs. CONCLUSIONS: Little evidence supports the use of diets other than LFDs for weight reduction. With the increasing prevalence of morbid obesity, long-term follow-up in RCTs is needed to evaluate the effect of LCDs, VLCDs and PSMFs more fully.