Home | Site Map | About | Contact 
  The scientific approach to weight loss and maintenance. Indepenent, hype-free research.
 
Weight Loss Guide
 Weight Loss Basics
 Diets & Dieting
 Drug Therapy
 Supplements
 Weight Loss Surgery
 Tools & Calculators
 
News & Research
 Weight Loss News
 Published Studies
   > Drugs
   > Diets
   > Supplements
   > Surgery
   > Lifestyle
 Clinical Trials
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
You are here: Published Weight Loss Studies >

Very low-fat (12%) and high monounsaturated fat (35%) diets do not differentially affect abdominal fat loss in overweight, nondiabetic women.

Author: Clifton PM, Noakes M, Keogh JB

Author affiliation: CSIRO Health Sciences and Nutrition, Adelaide BC, South Australia 5000. peter.clifton@hsn.csiro.au

Publication date & source: 2004.07, J Nutr., 134(7):1741-5.

Publication type: Clinical Trial; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Studies in women with type 2 diabetes demonstrated adverse effects on body fat distribution of a low-fat diet relative to a high monounsaturated fat diet. We performed a randomized 12-wk parallel design study of two 6000-kJ diets: 35% energy from fat (high monounsaturated fat diet, HIMO), or 12% energy from fat (very low-fat diet, VLF) to determine whether this also occurred in nondiabetic women. Body fat distribution, fasting plasma glucose, blood pressure, and fasting serum lipids were measured at wk 0 and 12 in 62 women (BMI > 27 kg/m(2)). Weight loss (9.5 +/- 2.4 vs. 9.4 +/- 3.4 kg, VLF vs. HIMO) and total fat loss (6.1 +/- 2.4 vs. 6.3 +/- 2.7 kg, VLF vs. HIMO) did not differ in the groups. There was a diet x menopausal status interaction in lean mass changes (P = 0.005) such that in premenopausal women, HIMO produced a lower loss of lean mass than the low-fat diet (0.4 +/- 2.3 vs. 2.9 +/- 2.7 kg, P = 0.006) with the opposite but nonsignificant effect seen in postmenopausal women. There was a greater decrease in total plasma cholesterol in women who consumed VLF compared with those who consumed HIMO (0.82 +/- 0.0.51 vs. 0.50 +/- 0.48 mmol/L, P < 0.001 for time, P < 0.05 for diet effect). This was also true for the change in HDL cholesterol (0.18 +/- 0.23 vs. 0.04 +/- 0.19 mmol/L, VLF and HIMO, respectively, P < 0.001 for time, P < 0.05 for diet effect). The LDL/HDL ratio was reduced in both groups with no effect of diet (0.16 +/- 0.51 vs. 0.16 +/- 0.45, VLF and HIMO, respectively, P < 0.05). In conclusion, weight, total fat mass, and regional fat mass loss did not differ in the 2 groups of women but there was an apparent preservation of lean mass in premenopausal women consuming HIMO.



Indexes of Weight Loss Research Abstracts
Weight Loss Drugs
Weight Loss Diets
Supplements
Bariatric Surgery
Lifestyle

     
-- advertisements --


Copyright © 2006 by Weight-Loss-Science.com
All inormation is for education purposes only and should not be considered as a medical advice.