Home | Site Map | About | Contact 
  The scientific approach to weight loss and maintenance. Indepenent, hype-free research.
 
Weight Loss Guide
 Weight Loss Basics
 Diets & Dieting
 Drug Therapy
 Supplements
 Weight Loss Surgery
 Tools & Calculators
 
News & Research
 Weight Loss News
 Published Studies
   > Drugs
   > Diets
   > Supplements
   > Surgery
   > Lifestyle
 Clinical Trials
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
You are here: Published Weight Loss Studies >

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus open vertical banded gastroplasty: a prospective randomized trial.

Author: van Dielen FM, Soeters PB, de Brauw LM, Greve JW

Author affiliation: Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands. f.vandielen@ah.unimaas.nl

Publication date & source: 2005.10, Obes Surg., 15(9):1292-8.

Publication type: Comparative Study ; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and open vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) are treatment modalities for morbid obesity. However, few prospective randomized clinical trials (RCT) have been performed to compare both operations. METHODS: 100 patients (50 per group) were included in the study. Postoperative outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), complications, percent excess weight loss (%EWL), BMI and reduction in total comorbidities. Follow-up in all patients was 2 years. RESULTS: LOS was significantly shorter in the LAGB group. 3 LAGB were converted to open (1 to gastric bypass). Directly after VBG, 3 patients needed relaparotomies due to leakage, of which one (2%) died. After 2 years, 100% follow-up was achieved. BMI and %EWL were significantly decreased in both groups but significantly more in the VBG group compared to the LAGB group (31.0 kg/m2 and 70.1% vs 34.6 and 54.9% respectively). Co-morbidities significantly decreased in both groups in time. 2 years after LAGB, 20 patients needed reoperation for pouch dilation/slippage (n=12), band leakage (n=2), band erosion (n=2) and access-port problems (n=4). In the VBG group, 18 patients needed revisional surgery due to staple-line disruption (n=15), narrow outlet (n=2) or insufficient weight loss (n=1). Furthermore, 8 VBG patients developed an incisional hernia. CONCLUSION: This RCT demonstrates that, despite the initial better weight loss in the VBG group, based on complication rates and clinical outcome, LAGB is preferred. It had a shorter LOS and less postoperative morbidity.



Indexes of Weight Loss Research Abstracts
Weight Loss Drugs
Weight Loss Diets
Supplements
Bariatric Surgery
Lifestyle

     
-- advertisements --


Copyright © 2006 by Weight-Loss-Science.com
All inormation is for education purposes only and should not be considered as a medical advice.